You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 15, October 15, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Renal Diseases
 •Dialysis
 •Ultrasonography
 •Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies
 •Hematology, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization for Short-term Dialysis Access—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Balamuthusamy and colleagues question the clinical relevance of asymptomatic thrombotic events. These events did not influence catheter removal in our study because ultrasound evaluations were performed after catheter removal. Review of severe adverse events in the participants identified no case of fatal pulmonary embolism related to the studied catheter. Because critically ill patients included in our study did not undergo systematic pulmonary evaluation or autopsy, I cannot comment further on the risk of pulmonary embolism; however, this topic is discussed in a study by Timsit et al.1

In response to Dr Eisen, I doubt that the incidence of catheter colonization was heavily overestimated by the landmark technique used for the jugular position because there were consistent results when considering only those in the jugular group with a 100% success rate. The hazard ratio (HR) for colonization between femoral and jugular sites after excluding 131 jugular catheters with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jean-Jacques Parienti, MD, DTM&H
parienti-jj@chu-caen.fr
Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Research
Côte de Nacre University Hospital
Caen, France



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization and Risk of Nosocomial Events in Adults Requiring Acute Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jean-Jacques Parienti, Marina Thirion, Bruno Mégarbane, Bertrand Souweine, Abdelali Ouchikhe, Andrea Polito, Jean-Marie Forel, Sophie Marqué, Benoît Misset, Norair Airapetian, Claire Daurel, Jean-Paul Mira, Michel Ramakers, Damien du Cheyron, Xavier Le Coutour, Cédric Daubin, Pierre Charbonneau, and for Members of the Cathedia Study Group
JAMA. 2008;299(20):2413-2422.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization for Short-term Dialysis Access
Saravanan Balamuthusamy, Ivo Lukitch, and Eric E. Simon
JAMA. 2008;300(15):1760-1761.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Femoral vs Jugular Venous Catheterization for Short-term Dialysis Access
Lewis Eisen
JAMA. 2008;300(15):1761.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.