You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 18, November 12, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Neurology
 •Cardiovascular Interventions, Other
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Stroke
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Interventions
 •Vascular Surgery
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Carotid Endarterectomy and Statin Therapy in the Management of Patients With Carotid Artery Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Carotid artery disease is a common and treatable cause of transient ischemic attacks and strokes. Carotid endarterectomy is a safe and effective means of reducing neurological complications, including the risk of stroke,1 in the types of cases of severe internal carotid artery stenosis discussed in the Clinical Crossroads article by Dr Caplan.2 The question of optimal timing of surgery following the incident event is critical to discuss in this patient population, especially since "early" intervention has had different meanings in various trials and timing may be associated with important effects on outcome.

A systematic review pooling data from randomized trials and surgical case series demonstrated a higher risk for carotid endarterectomy performed urgently for evolving symptoms when compared with carotid endarterectomy performed for stable symptoms in 13 studies (risk difference, 19.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.7-27.8; P < .001). However, among 11 studies there was no difference between . . . [Full Text of this Article]

John R. Kapoor, MD, PhD
jkapoor@stanford.edu
Division of Cardiology
Stanford University
Stanford, California



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Carotid Endarterectomy as the Criterion Standard in High-Risk Elderly Patients
Ahmed Suliman, Joshua Greenberg, Ankur Chandra, Samuel Barillas, Pooya Iranpour, and Niren Angle
Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):736-742.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 70-Year-Old Man With a Transient Ischemic Attack: Review of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis
Louis R. Caplan
JAMA. 2008;300(1):81-90.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Carotid Endarterectomy and Statin Therapy in the Management of Patients With Carotid Artery Disease
Luca Mascitelli, Francesca Pezzetta, and Mark R. Goldstein
JAMA. 2008;300(18):2118.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Carotid Endarterectomy and Statin Therapy in the Management of Patients With Carotid Artery Disease—Reply
Louis R. Caplan
JAMA. 2008;300(18):2119.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.