You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 18, November 12, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (6)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Cerebrovascular Disease
 •Stroke
 •Oncology
 •Cervical Cancer
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Emergency Medicine
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Translating New Medical Therapies Into Societal Benefit

The Role of Population-Based Outcome Studies

Christopher M. Booth, MD, FRCPC; William J. Mackillop, MB, ChB, FRCPC

JAMA. 2008;300(18):2177-2179.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Phase 4 studies have traditionally monitored safety of new drugs and occasionally served as marketing tools for pharmaceutical companies. In the 1990s these "seeding studies" came under criticism for the substantial influence industry had on study design and interpretation.1-2 Recently, innovative study designs and access to large electronic databases have allowed investigators to evaluate outcomes in the general population and provide information regarding uptake, safety, and outcomes in the real world.3 These population-based outcome studies may have important potential roles in clinical research. In this Commentary, we describe several examples that demonstrate the emerging roles of these studies and propose that they could be considered as adjuncts to and occasionally as substitutes for randomized controlled trials.

Contemporary Population-Based Outcomes Studies

Spironolactone in Patients With Heart Failure

In 1999, Pitt et al4 evaluated the addition of spironolactone to standard medical therapy for congestive heart failure. The authors reported that spironolactone . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Chemoradiotherapy for Patients With Cervical Cancer

Urgent Treatment for Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke

Author Affiliations: Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

CT Angiography: First Things First
Lauer
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2:1-3.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.