You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 2, July 9, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Capitol Health Call
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Redundant Drug Benefits

Mike Mitka

JAMA. 2008;300(2):160.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Federal retirees enrolled in 2 government-sponsored prescription drug programs and the federal government are paying as much as $200 million a year for duplicative coverage.

In letters sent May 12 to Bush administration officials, Rep Henry A. Waxman (D, Calif), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Rep Danny K. Davis (D, Ill), chairman of the Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service, and the District of Columbia, said the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) are not coordinating their coverage of the more than 200 000 federal retirees. Because these retirees are enrolled in both the Federal Employee Health Benefit Plans with drug benefits and the separate Medicare Part D plan, they and the government, which subsidizes coverage, are paying twice, the representatives said.

Waxman and Davis wrote, "Please explain why CMS and OPM have failed to . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.