You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 20, November 26, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Benefits and Risks of Drug Treatments

How to Combine the Best Evidence on Benefits With the Best Data About Adverse Effects

Jan P. Vandenbroucke, MD, PhD; Bruce M. Psaty, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2008;300(20):2417-2419.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The central theme of the Institute of Medicine report on the US drug safety system was the need for a life cycle approach to drug evaluation: both the benefits and the risks need to be evaluated and integrated during the entire market life of a drug.1 The Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 also called on the agency to improve its methods of communicating risks and benefits to patients and physicians. The Institute of Medicine recommendation to "develop and continually improve a systematic approach to risk-benefit analysis for use throughout the [Food and Drug Administration] in the preapproval and postapproval settings" specifically acknowledges the need for and the challenges of the development of new methods of combining evidence about risks and benefits.1

Information that combines the best evidence on benefits with the best data on risks is also . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands (Dr Vandenbroucke); and the Cardiovascular Health Research Unit, Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Services, University of Washington and Center for Health Studies, Group Health, Seattle (Dr Psaty).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Syncope and Its Consequences in Patients With Dementia Receiving Cholinesterase Inhibitors: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Gill et al.
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:867-873.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Role of Diabetes Educators in the Medical Home
O'Connor and Sperl-Hillen
Diabetes Spectr. 2009;22:124-126.
FULL TEXT  

Cochrane Public Health Review Group update: incorporating research generated outside of the health sector
Armstrong et al.
J Public Health (Oxf) 2009;31:187-189.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.