You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 21, December 3, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Incorporating Patient Preferences in Evidence-Based Medicine—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: The history of EBM and its intellectual forebear, clinical epidemiology, starts long before 1993 when the first Users' Guides publication appeared. Daly's book describing the development of EBM1 suggests that the primary motivations among the early pioneers of this movement (eg, Alvan Feinstein, David Sackett) were to bring the scientific method to the practice of medicine, to distinguish between effective and ineffective care (Archie Cochrane), and to overturn the earlier paradigm of clinical practice based on authority and dogma (Sackett). The humanistic and ethical aspects of medical practice were emphasized by Henrik Wulff2 and Gordon Guyatt, but the main impetus and primary focus of the movement has historically been, and arguably currently remains, on bringing rational, quantitative methods to the practice of medicine.

We acknowledge that since the early 1990s leaders in the EBM movement have emphasized the importance of patients' preferences and more recently have discussed the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Murray Krahn, MD, MSc
murray.krahn@theta.utoronto.ca
Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment Collaborative

Gary Naglie, MD
Department of Medicine
University of Toronto
Toronto, Ontario, Canada



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Next Step in Guideline Development: Incorporating Patient Preferences
Murray Krahn and Gary Naglie
JAMA. 2008;300(4):436-438.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Incorporating Patient Preferences in Evidence-Based Medicine
M. Hassan Murad, Victor M. Montori, and Gordon H. Guyatt
JAMA. 2008;300(21):2483.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.