 |
 |

Review of The Invisible Cure—Reply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Perhaps because I found fault as well as (mostly) praise for her book, Dr Epstein suggests I had an undeclared conflict of interest due to an unflattering portrayal in her book. Epstein in fact introduces me as a "voice in the wilderness" who "had been arguing for years that abstinence, faithfulness, and reductions in casual sex had been more important than condoms in Uganda."1(p187) This is a portrayal I find accurate, not unflattering, and not unlike Epstein's own position. However, on p 188 Epstein claims I defended "abstinence-only-until-marriage programs." This is misleading; I have written and stated repeatedly that abstinence is only one part of a comprehensive prevention program.
Although sex inequality and economic inequality can certainly exacerbate the spread of HIV, data suggest that the relationship between these factors is complicated and does not always go in the direction that one would expect.2 Epstein seems to recognize . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Edward C. Green, PhD
egreen@hsph.harvard.edu Harvard School of Public Health Boston, Massachusetts
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
The Invisible Cure: Africa, the West, and the Fight Against AIDS
Edward C. Green
JAMA. 2008;300(5):587-589.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Review of The Invisible Cure
Helen Epstein
JAMA. 2008;300(21):2485.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|