You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 23, December 17, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders, Other
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The meta-analysis by Dr Soylemez Weiner and colleagues1 suggested limited benefits, if any, of tight glucose control in critically ill adults and a 3- to 5-fold increased risk of hypoglycemia. The accompanying Editorial by Drs Finfer and Delaney2 discussed the findings in relation to the study by van den Berghe et al,3 which demonstrated that tight glucose control reduced mortality by one-third in surgical ICU patients. The Editorial briefly mentioned the possibility of inaccurate bedside glucose testing. We suggest that this concern should be considered more carefully.

The original study by van den Berghe et al3 used a precise arterial blood gas instrument for glucose measurement and arterial blood samples. In contrast, a second study from van den Berghe et al,4 which did not show improved mortality for medical ICU patients, used a point-of-care glucose meter with, in some cases, capillary (skin puncture) blood samples. This approach, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Mitchell G. Scott, PhD
mscott@labmed.wustl.edu
Division of Laboratory and Genomic Medicine
Department of Pathology and Immunology
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri

David E. Bruns, MD
Department of Pathology
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville

David B. Sacks, MD
Department of Pathology
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Benefits and Risks of Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults: A Meta-analysis
Renda Soylemez Wiener, Daniel C. Wiener, and Robin J. Larson
JAMA. 2008;300(8):933-944.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults
Greet Hermans, Miet Schetz, and Greet van den Berghe
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2725.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults
Jean-Charles Preiser and Philippe Devos
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2726.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults
Bruce Ryan Bistrian
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2726.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults—Reply
Renda Soylemez Wiener, Daniel C. Wiener, and Robin J. Larson
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2726-2727.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tight Glucose Control in Critically Ill Adults—Reply
Simon Finfer and Anthony Delaney
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2727-2728.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.