You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 24, December 24/31, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient-Physician Communication
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physician Autonomy and Informed Decision Making

Finding the Balance for Patient Safety and Quality

Simon C. Mathews; Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2008;300(24):2913-2915.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The publication of To Err Is Human was the vanguard to improve patient safety.1 Upon nearing the report's 10-year anniversary, little appears to have changed with significant barriers encountered when attempting to track progress.2

A long overdue and central thrust to improve patient safety and quality is standardizing the delivery of health care. In this Commentary, standards refer to explicit criteria when using specific preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic interventions and when delivering health services. Standards take many forms, from protocols developed by a health system, insurer, or professional society to safety practices developed by national organizations.

Standardized care requires physicians to engage in informed decision making, in which their decisions are based on rules intended to optimize patients' clinical or economic outcomes.3 Physicians are often the purveyors of information to help patients make informed decisions about their care. However, if the benefit . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Autonomous vs Informed Decision Making

Author Affiliations: Johns Hopkins School of Medicine (Mr Mathews); and Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine; and Department of Health Policy Management, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health (Dr Pronovost), Baltimore, Maryland.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Balancing "No Blame" with Accountability in Patient Safety
Wachter and Pronovost
NEJM 2009;361:1401-1406.
FULL TEXT  

The Ethical Foundation of American Medicine: In Search of Social Justice
Kirch and Vernon
JAMA 2009;301:1482-1484.
FULL TEXT  

Quality and safety are rarely simple
Stevens
Qual Saf Health Care 2009;18:82-83.
FULL TEXT  

World Kidney Day 2009: Problems and Challenges in the Emerging Epidemic of Kidney Disease
Szczech et al.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2009;20:453-455.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.