You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 4, July 23/30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Lipids and Lipid Disorders
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Oral Hypoglycemic Use and the SANDS Trial

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Howard and colleagues1 reported a 0.012-mm reduction in carotid intimal media thickness (IMT) among participants randomized to aggressive blood pressure/low-density lipid cholesterol–lowering treatment and a 0.038-mm increase in carotid IMT among participants randomized to standard treatment after 36 months in the Stop Atherosclerosis in Native Diabetics Study (SANDS). Randomization is assumed to equally distribute all known and unknown confounders between experimental groups. However, potential confounders may be unevenly distributed between groups in small trials or within strata of large trials and subsequently induce bias despite randomization.2 Such accidental bias is possible in SANDS because at baseline 82% of participants in the aggressive treatment group concomitantly received oral hypoglycemic medications compared with 73% in the standard treatment group (P = .02). Oral hypoglycemic medications such as metformin and pioglitazone have demonstrated beneficial effects on carotid IMT independent of glycemic control,3-4 and both medications are common components of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Eva L. Evans, MPH
eevans@hsc.unt.edu

Rohit P. Ojha, MPH; Lori A. Fischbach, PhD, MPH
Department of Epidemiology
University of North Texas Health Science Center
Fort Worth



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Effect of Lower Targets for Blood Pressure and LDL Cholesterol on Atherosclerosis in Diabetes: The SANDS Randomized Trial
Barbara V. Howard, Mary J. Roman, Richard B. Devereux, Jerome L. Fleg, James M. Galloway, Jeffrey A. Henderson, Wm. James Howard, Elisa T. Lee, Mihriye Mete, Bryce Poolaw, Robert E. Ratner, Marie Russell, Angela Silverman, Mario Stylianou, Jason G. Umans, Wenyu Wang, Matthew R. Weir, Neil J. Weissman, Charlton Wilson, Fawn Yeh, and Jianhui Zhu
JAMA. 2008;299(14):1678-1689.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Pioglitazone Compared With Glimepiride on Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Trial
Theodore Mazzone, Peter M. Meyer, Steven B. Feinstein, Michael H. Davidson, George T. Kondos, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Sr, Alfonso Perez, Jean-Claude Provost, and Steven M. Haffner
JAMA. 2006;296(21):2572-2581.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Oral Hypoglycemic Use and the SANDS Trial—Reply
Barbara V. Howard, William James Howard, and Robert E. Ratner
JAMA. 2008;300(4):389-390.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.