You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 5, August 6, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Screening
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The study by Dr Harbarth and colleagues1 and the accompanying editorial by Drs Diekema and Climo2 conclude that selective and incomplete expansion of MRSA screening may not prevent MRSA hospital-acquired infections. There are several issues that we believe require clarification.

First, the term "universal screening" for MRSA is misused and misleading. In this quasi-experimental study, 2 surgical subspecialty patient groups were screened for MRSA sequentially, not simultaneously. This is not universal screening of all hospital patients or even all surgical patients. A recent observational study using true universal MRSA screening (all patients on admission) found significantly reduced rates of MRSA hospital-acquired infections.3

Second, it is not clear whether the surgical patients screened were in wards or units that were separate from those not screened or if health care workers (particularly surgeons) moved between screened/isolated and nonscreened/nonisolated populations. Third, the current study by Harbarth et al did not . . . [Full Text of this Article]

William R. Jarvis, MD
wrjmj@aol.com
Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases
Emory University School of Medicine
Atlanta, Georgia

Carlene Muto, MD, MS
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hospital Admission and Nosocomial Infection in Surgical Patients
Stephan Harbarth, Carolina Fankhauser, Jacques Schrenzel, Jan Christenson, Pascal Gervaz, Catherine Bandiera-Clerc, Gesuele Renzi, Nathalie Vernaz, Hugo Sax, and Didier Pittet
JAMA. 2008;299(10):1149-1157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals
Rosemary Harris
JAMA. 2008;300(5):503.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals
Cassandra D. Salgado, Margreet C. Vos, and Barry M. Farr
JAMA. 2008;300(5):503-504.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals—Reply
Stephan Harbarth and Didier Pittet
JAMA. 2008;300(5):504-505.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals—Reply
Daniel J. Diekema and Michael Climo
JAMA. 2008;300(5):505-506.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.