You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 300 No. 5, August 6, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Screening
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: While Drs Jarvis and Muto describe the MRSA screening intervention as "selective and incomplete," the study by Harbarth et al1 was in fact a crossover design in which screening on the intervention wards was as close to universal as can be reasonably achieved (94% of all admissions screened). The presence of geographically distinct wards that were used as contemporaneous controls strengthens rather than weakens the study. By contrast, the study by Robicsek et al2 to which Jarvis and Muto refer lacked a control group and used multiple simultaneous interventions, flaws that are common to other studies that are cited in support of active surveillance and contact isolation.3-4

Harbarth et al and Robicsek et al are difficult to compare because of differences in their conception, the patient populations, and the measured outcomes. Robicsek et al initiated universal active surveillance and decolonization in response to ongoing high rates of nosocomial . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Daniel J. Diekema, MD
Division of Infectious Diseases
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine
Iowa City

Michael Climo, MD
michael.climo@va.gov
Division of Infectious Diseases
Hunter Holmes McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia


RELATED ARTICLE

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hospital Admission and Nosocomial Infection in Surgical Patients
Stephan Harbarth, Carolina Fankhauser, Jacques Schrenzel, Jan Christenson, Pascal Gervaz, Catherine Bandiera-Clerc, Gesuele Renzi, Nathalie Vernaz, Hugo Sax, and Didier Pittet
JAMA. 2008;299(10):1149-1157.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals
Rosemary Harris
JAMA. 2008;300(5):503.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals
Cassandra D. Salgado, Margreet C. Vos, and Barry M. Farr
JAMA. 2008;300(5):503-504.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals
William R. Jarvis and Carlene Muto
JAMA. 2008;300(5):504.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by Hospitals—Reply
Stephan Harbarth and Didier Pittet
JAMA. 2008;300(5):504-505.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.