 |
 |

Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride in the PERISCOPE Trial
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Nissen and colleagues1 reported that in patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease, treatment with pioglitazone resulted in a significantly lower rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis compared with glimepiride. According to the authors, patients randomized to pioglitazone exhibited a lower rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis across a wide array of prespecified and exploratory subgroups. Similar results by the same group and other researchers have been reported with statin treatment, in particular with rosuvastatin and atorvastatin.2-3 Given that statins are known to provide this type of benefit, a possible interference of statin exposure should have been taken into consideration in the study design, possibly stratifying treatment allocation on the basis of statin presence or absence.
In the PERISCOPE trial,1 patients randomized to pioglitazone who were not treated with a statin showed disease progression (percentage atheroma volume change from baseline, +0.92%; 95% confidence interval . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Claudio Fresco, MD
clfresco@fastwebnet.it Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences University Hospital Udine Udine, Italy
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Comparison of Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: The PERISCOPE Randomized Controlled Trial
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , and
JAMA. ;299():1561-1573.
FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride in the PERISCOPE Trial
JAMA. ;300():787-788.
FULL TEXT
Pioglitazone vs Glimepiride in the PERISCOPE Trial--Reply
, , and
JAMA. ;300():788-788.
FULL TEXT
|