 |
 |

Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The analysis of prostate cancer–specific and overall survival by Dr Lu-Yao and colleagues1 concluded that primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) offered no benefit compared with conservative management in elderly men with localized prostate cancer. Since their comparison was based on epidemiologic data rather than those obtained in a prospective randomized trial, there is a possibility that confounding variables may have influenced patient outcomes.
Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been shown to be an independent predictor of outcome in newly diagnosed patients2 and may often be used by clinicians to choose recommended therapy. It seems likely that men with higher PSA levels (and thus worse prognoses) were those who were given PADT. However, the study by Lu-Yao et al does not include an analysis of PSA data and their possible influence on treatment recommendations. In the absence of this information, it is not possible to conclude that PADT . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Leslie Laufman, MD
llaufman@columbus.rr.com Columbus, Ohio
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Survival Following Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy Among Men With Localized Prostate Cancer
Grace L. Lu-Yao, Peter C. Albertsen, Dirk F. Moore, Weichung Shih, Yong Lin, Robert S. DiPaola, and Siu-Long Yao
JAMA. 2008;300(2):173-181.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Men With Prostate Cancer—Reply
Grace L. Lu-Yao, Weichung Shih, and Siu-Long Yao
JAMA. 2009;301(1):35.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Resolving Unreported Conflicts of Interest
DeAngelis and Fontanarosa
JAMA 2009;302:198-199.
FULL TEXT
|