You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 10, March 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment With Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their trial of treatment to prevent atrial fibrillation, Dr Ahmed and colleagues1 reported more atrial fibrillation recurrences, all-cause mortality, and bleeding complications in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion who were randomized to receive episodic amiodarone treatment compared with those who received continuous treatment. However, there are several issues that may have affected the validity of the conclusions.

The authors reported unadjusted survival curves for all of the prespecified end points. However, the episodic amiodarone group had significantly larger left atria (P = .01 for the long axis measurements), and atrial size has been shown to predict atrial fibrillation recurrences.2 Therefore, the higher atrial fibrillation recurrence rate in that group cannot be attributed solely to the different treatment strategy.

Moreover, the choice of a high intensity of anticoagulation (targeted international normalized ratio [INR] between 2.5 and 3.5),3 and the lack of data on the INR . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Pasquale Santangeli, MD
pasquale.santangeli@libero.it

Antonio Dello Russo, MD; Fulvio Bellocci, MD
Cardiovascular Department
Catholic University
Rome, Italy



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Continuous vs Episodic Prophylactic Treatment With Amiodarone for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Trial
Sheba Ahmed, Michiel Rienstra, Harry J. G. M. Crijns, Thera P. Links, Ans C. P. Wiesfeld, Hans L. Hillege, Hans A. Bosker, Dirk J. A. Lok, Dirk J. Van Veldhuisen, Isabelle C. Van Gelder, and for the CONVERT Investigators
JAMA. 2008;300(15):1784-1792.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Treatment With Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation
Madhavi Bollu, Ravi K. Bobba, and Edward L. Arsura
JAMA. 2009;301(10):1019-1020.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Treatment With Amiodarone to Prevent Atrial Fibrillation—Reply
Sheba Ahmed, Harry J. G. M. Crijns, and Isabelle C. Van Gelder
JAMA. 2009;301(10):1020.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.