You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 11, March 18, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Analyzing Patient Case Mix and Hospital Rankings

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their study of patient case-mix adjustment, hospital process performance rankings, and eligibility for financial incentives, Dr Mehta and colleagues1 tackled an important question in health services research. However, the unit of analysis they used in their study seems inconsistent. For example, in the Methods section, the authors stated that the analysis used opportunity-based data. Later, however, the authors stated that they adjusted for opportunity mix in the analyses. It seems that adjustment should be performed at the patient level, not the opportunity level. Furthermore, the authors stated that the hospital rankings were based on the scores for composite process measures. This again indicates the unit of analysis should be patient, not opportunity (ie, quality measure), because each patient has a composite score summarizing 8 quality measures.2

Traditionally, process measures are often modeled at the hospital level.3 In the study by Mehta et al, to adjust for . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Chu-Lin Tsai, MD, ScD
cltsai@post.harvard.edu
Department of Emergency Medicine
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Association of Patient Case-Mix Adjustment, Hospital Process Performance Rankings, and Eligibility for Financial Incentives
Rajendra H. Mehta, Li Liang, Amrita M. Karve, Adrian F. Hernandez, John S. Rumsfeld, Gregg C. Fonarow, and Eric D. Peterson
JAMA. 2008;300(16):1897-1903.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Analyzing Patient Case Mix and Hospital Rankings—Reply
Rajendra H. Mehta, Li Liang, and Eric D. Peterson
JAMA. 2009;301(11):1125.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.