You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 11, March 18, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  JAMA Classics: Celebrating 125 Years
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Original Article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Coma/ Vegetative State
 •Deep Brain Stimulation
 •JAMA Classics
 •Humanities
 •History of Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Consciousness, Coma, and Brain Death—2009

Commentary by Roger N. Rosenberg, MD

JAMA. 2009;301(11):1172-1174.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

SUMMARY OF THE ORIGINAL ARTICLE

A Definition of Irreversible Coma: Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death

Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death

JAMA. 1968;205(6):337-340.

This landmark classic article was the first to quantitatively define the clinical and laboratory criteria used to measure the presence of brain death. The study included "only those comatose individuals who have no discernible central nervous system activity." Criteria to establish the presence of irreversible coma included (1) unreceptivity and unresponsitivity; (2) no movements or breathing; (3) no reflexes (brain stem); and (4) flat electroencephalogram. These criteria are still considered to be reliable and acceptable by the medical community and have become established into law, which states that brain death is equivalent to death and that all artificial support . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Controversies About Brain Death
Franklin G. Miller and Robert D. Truog
JAMA. 2009;302(4):380-381.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death
Thomas E. Finucane
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death
Avak Albert Howsepian
JAMA. 2009;302(4):381.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Death and organ donation: back to the future
Miller
J. Med. Ethics 2009;35:616-620.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death
Finucane
JAMA 2009;302:381-381.
FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death
Miller and Truog
JAMA 2009;302:380-381.
FULL TEXT  

Controversies About Brain Death
Howsepian
JAMA 2009;302:381-381.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.