 |
 |

The Role of Tax Reform in Health Care Reform—Reply
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply: Dr Floyd and colleagues raise important questions about our proposal to assign taxes a central role in health care reform, rather than view them merely as a source of revenue. We argued that the antiquated tax structure now funding health care badly needs an overhaul, and we advocated a plan to finance universal health insurance vouchers with a VAT. This would convert the fragmented confederation of health care subgroups into a unified system covering everyone, young and old, employed or not.
They note correctly that a VAT, a form of sales tax, is in principle regressive, imposing a heavier burden on low-income than high-income families. We are aware that this is only partly ameliorated by the health insurance the former would receive and that a VAT by itself could reduce low-income families' disposable income far too much. We pointed out that adjustments to other elements of the tax . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Samuel Y. Sessions, MD, JD
ssessions@mednet.ucla.edu Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Science Harbor-UCLA Medical Center Torrance, California
Philip R. Lee, MD
School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
The Role of Tax Reform in Health Care Reform
James S. Floyd, Sidney M. Wolfe, and Marcia Angell
JAMA. 2009;301(12):1226.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|