You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 12, March 25, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Bacterial Infections
 •Infectious Diseases, Other
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Surgery
 •Surgical Physiology
 •Surgical Infections
 •Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies
 •Hematology, Other
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Preventing Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

Thinking Outside the Checklist

Eli N. Perencevich, MD, MS; Didier Pittet, MD, MS

JAMA. 2009;301(12):1285-1287.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The medical care system is at a crossroads in the control of health care–associated infections. For years, the status quo has been defined by scattered local success stories but an overall failure to protect patients from largely preventable infections. These infections have enormous human and economic costs, with an estimated 100 000 deaths and $6.5 billion in excess expenditure annually in the United States alone1-2 and estimates of 1.4 million patients affected daily worldwide.3-4 Catheter-related bloodstream infection is a leading contributor to health care–associated infection. Approximately 80 000 catheter-related bloodstream infections occur annually in US intensive care units (ICUs) and are associated with as many as 24 000 patient deaths.5 Each of these infections is estimated to have a mean attributable cost of $18 000 and an associated excess hospital stay of 12 days per episode.6

There are many reasons for this global epidemic of . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Departments of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, and VA Maryland Health Care System, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore (Dr Perencevich); Infection Control Program, University of Geneva Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety, First Global Patient Safety Challenge, World Health Organization Headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland (Dr Pittet).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Chlorhexidine-Impregnated Sponges and Less Frequent Dressing Changes for Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections in Critically Ill Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Jean-François Timsit, Carole Schwebel, Lila Bouadma, Arnaud Geffroy, Maïté Garrouste-Orgeas, Sebastian Pease, Marie-Christine Herault, Hakim Haouache, Silvia Calvino-Gunther, Brieuc Gestin, Laurence Armand-Lefevre, Véronique Leflon, Chantal Chaplain, Adel Benali, Adrien Francais, Christophe Adrie, Jean-Ralph Zahar, Marie Thuong, Xavier Arrault, Jacques Croize, Jean-Christophe Lucet, and for the Dressing Study Group
JAMA. 2009;301(12):1231-1241.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.