You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 15, April 15, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Nutritional and Metabolic Disorders
 •Nutrition/ Malnutrition
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evidence-Based Nutrition Guidelines for Critically Ill Adults—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: The recent update of the Critical Care Nutrition Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines aggregated the results of 14 randomized clinical trials of early enteral nutrition vs delayed nutrient intake. It observed that early enteral nutrition was associated with a statistically significant reduction in infectious complications (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.98; P = .04) and a statistically nonsignificant reduction in mortality (relative risk, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-1.01; P = .06).1 We therefore agree with Dr Finucane that existing evidence supporting a survival advantage associated with the delivery of early, aggressive artificial nutrition in critically ill patients is weak, but we would disagree that this is because an association does not exist. The results of 11 of these 14 RCTs favored early enteral nutrition, but it is likely that statistical significance was not reached due to small sample sizes. In addition, all 14 of these RCTs had inherent design flaws . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Naomi E. Jones, RD, MSc; Daren K. Heyland, MD
dkh2@queensu.ca
Kingston General Hospital
Kingston, Ontario, Canada



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effect of Evidence-Based Feeding Guidelines on Mortality of Critically Ill Adults: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Gordon S. Doig, Fiona Simpson, Simon Finfer, Anthony Delaney, Andrew R. Davies, Imogen Mitchell, Geoff Dobb, and for the Nutrition Guidelines Investigators of the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group
JAMA. 2008;300(23):2731-2741.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Evidence-Based Nutrition Guidelines for Critically Ill Adults
Marcus J. Schultz, Peter Spronk, and Robert Tepaske
JAMA. 2009;301(15):1542-1543.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Nutrition Guidelines for Critically Ill Adults
Thomas E. Finucane
JAMA. 2009;301(15):1543.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-Based Nutrition Guidelines for Critically Ill Adults—Reply
Gordon S. Doig and Fiona Simpson
JAMA. 2009;301(15):1543-1544.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.