You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 15, April 15, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Progress in Diabetes Research—What's Next

David M. Nathan, MD

JAMA. 2009;301(15):1599-1601.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The pandemic of diabetes threatens to overwhelm clinicians' collective ability to treat the associated metabolic abnormalities and long-term complications. Yet even in the setting of the pandemic, clinical research has yielded remarkable progress that has improved the long-term prognosis of diabetes.

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and its long-term follow-up definitively established hyperglycemia as the—or at least a—major cause of complications of diabetes by demonstrating that intensive therapy achieving a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of approximately 7% reduced the development and progression of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy by 30% to 76%, compared with conventional treatment that achieved an HbA1c level of approximately 9%.1 The long-term follow-up results have demonstrated that the relative benefits of intensive therapy persist for at least 10 years after the end of the intensive intervention, even after the HbA1c levels in the treatment groups converged, a phenomenon termed "metabolic memory."2-3 Long-term . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Diabetes Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.