You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 16, April 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their systematic review and meta-analysis, Dr Kesselheim and colleagues1 assessed the equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs for cardiovascular disease. Several studies that I participated in were evaluated by the authors,2-4 and I generally agree with their conclusions. However, it is important to consider the limitations of current scientific evidence.

Most studies comparing generics to brand-name drugs use normal volunteers or relatively healthy patients. Tables 1, 2, and 3 in the study by Kesselheim et al indicate that 57% of the studies involved healthy volunteers. Pharmaceutical parameters such as tablet strength, dissolution, binding excipients, and the resulting absorption determine equivalence between generics and brand drugs. Although these characteristics may be fairly consistent in homogeneous healthy young participants, they can be very different among heterogeneous older patients because physiologic parameters change with age or disease. Small changes in something as apparently minor as the rate at which . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Barry L. Carter, PharmD
barry.carter@uiowa.edu
Division of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy
College of Pharmacy
University of Iowa
Iowa City



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Clinical Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs Used in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
, , , , , , and
JAMA. ;300():2514-2526.
FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease

JAMA. ;301():1654-1655.
FULL TEXT  

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease

JAMA. ;301():1655-1655.
FULL TEXT  

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease--Reply
, , and
JAMA. ;301():1655-1656.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.