You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 16, April 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Kesselheim and colleagues1 evaluated the clinical equivalence of generic and brand-name drugs used in cardiovascular disease. I agree in general with their statement that " . . . the best evidence for clinical equivalence emerged from high-quality prospective RCTs in patients with cardiovascular disease involving β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and statins." However, I would not lump the 3 chemical classes of calcium channel antagonists together.

Phenylalkylamines, such as the verapamil derivatives, are marketed as a racemic mixture of enantiomers. The 2 enantiomers have been shown to have different pharmacodynamic activities. S-verapamil has demonstrated 20 times the potency on a weight basis compared with R-verapamil with regard to negative dromotropic effects on the cardiac conduction system.2 Most of the vasodilatory effects of this agent have been attributable to the R-enantiomer.2

With respect to pharmacokinetics, racemic verapamil undergoes enantiomer preferred metabolism by both cytochromes 3A4 and 1A2.3 Moreover, administration of racemic intravenous, . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Michael James Zema, MD
mjzema@optonline.net
State University of New York
Stony Brook



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Clinical Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs Used in Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Aaron S. Kesselheim, Alexander S. Misono, Joy L. Lee, Margaret R. Stedman, M. Alan Brookhart, Niteesh K. Choudhry, and William H. Shrank
JAMA. 2008;300(21):2514-2526.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease
Barry L. Carter
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1654.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease
James A. Reiffel
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1655.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Equivalence of Generic and Brand-Name Drugs for Cardiovascular Disease—Reply
Aaron S. Kesselheim, Alexander S. Misono, and William H. Shrank
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1655-1656.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.