You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 16, April 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular Interventions, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The study by Dr Hernandez and colleagues1 reported on outcomes of ventricular assist device recipients by analyzing claims from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services from 2000 to 2006. They reported a 1-year survival of 51.6% for the primary device group and 30.8% for the postcardiotomy group. Given the introductory comments as well as numerous references to the REMATCH trial2 and the 50% 2-year survival benchmark set by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group for destination therapy (the use of ventricular assist devices in patients who are not candidates for cardiac transplantation),3 we are concerned that this analysis does not represent the current state of destination therapy in the Medicare population. As the authors state in their limitations section, their analysis reflects the use of a large variety of devices ranging from percutaneous external devices to long-term implantable devices used for destination therapy. . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Daniel B. Sims, MD
das9093@nyp.org
Division of Cardiology

Yoshifumi Naka, MD, PhD
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery

Ulrich P. Jorde, MD
Division of Cardiology
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, NY



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Long-term Outcomes and Costs of Ventricular Assist Devices Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Adrian F. Hernandez, Alisa M. Shea, Carmelo A. Milano, Joseph G. Rogers, Bradley G. Hammill, Christopher M. O’Connor, Kevin A. Schulman, Eric D. Peterson, and Lesley H. Curtis
JAMA. 2008;300(20):2398-2406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Leslie W. Miller
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1656-1657.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Mark S. Slaughter
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1657-1658.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices—Reply
Adrian F. Hernandez, Bradley G. Hammill, and Lesley H. Curtis
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1658.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.