You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 16, April 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular Interventions, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Heart failure is a significant health care issue in the United States, with more than 5 million people currently affected and more than 50 000 deaths per year with heart failure as a primary cause.1 As the population ages, this will become an even greater problem. Left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy are slowly emerging as the treatment of choice for appropriately selected patients. With new technology, advances in patient selection, and management and implantation at an experienced center, survival rates are now approaching 75% at 2 years.2

Although the study by Dr Hernandez and colleagues3 is a comprehensive analysis of a defined Medicare recipient group receiving ventricular assist devices, its implications and conclusions are potentially misleading regarding destination therapy. The authors cited studies of ventricular assist devices implanted for destination therapy, and in the "Results" apparently assumed that the patients they analyzed in the primary device . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Mark S. Slaughter, MD
mark.slaughter@louisville.edu
Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
University of Louisville
Louisville, Kentucky



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Long-term Outcomes and Costs of Ventricular Assist Devices Among Medicare Beneficiaries
Adrian F. Hernandez, Alisa M. Shea, Carmelo A. Milano, Joseph G. Rogers, Bradley G. Hammill, Christopher M. O’Connor, Kevin A. Schulman, Eric D. Peterson, and Lesley H. Curtis
JAMA. 2008;300(20):2398-2406.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Leslie W. Miller
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1656-1657.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Daniel B. Sims, Yoshifumi Naka, and Ulrich P. Jorde
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1657.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices—Reply
Adrian F. Hernandez, Bradley G. Hammill, and Lesley H. Curtis
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1658.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.