You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 16, April 22/29, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Aging/ Geriatrics
 •Cardiovascular Interventions, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Congestive Heart Failure/ Cardiomyopathy
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Dr Miller and Dr Sims and colleagues highlight an inherent challenge of studying long-term outcomes associated with evolving technologies like ventricular assist devices. By the time long-term outcome data become available, a new generation of devices has entered the market. This challenge is not unique to ventricular assist devices, and experience with other devices indicates that postmarketing surveillance is important.1-2 Although the most recent generation of assist devices represents an important advance, only time will tell how well the devices work in patients who receive them outside of clinical trials. When sufficient long-term data on the current generation of continuous-flow devices are available, another generation will have emerged. Once again, there will be a new technology but no relevant long-term data.

Drs Slaughter and Sims et al raise important questions about the heterogeneity of the patients and centers included in our analysis. We examined the outcomes of all . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Adrian F. Hernandez, MD, MHS
adrian.hernandez@duke.edu

Bradley G. Hammill, MS; Lesley H. Curtis, PhD
Duke University School of Medicine
Durham, North Carolina



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Outcomes and Complications Associated With Off-Label and Untested Use of Drug-Eluting Stents
Nirat Beohar, Charles J. Davidson, Kevin E. Kip, Lynne Goodreau, Helen Aslanidou Vlachos, Sheridan N. Meyers, Keith H. Benzuly, James D. Flaherty, Mark J. Ricciardi, Charles L. Bennett, and David O. Williams
JAMA. 2007;297(18):1992-2000.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Pacemaker and ICD Generator Malfunctions: Analysis of Food and Drug Administration Annual Reports
William H. Maisel, Megan Moynahan, Bram D. Zuckerman, Thomas P. Gross, Oscar H. Tovar, Donna-Bea Tillman, and Daniel B. Schultz
JAMA. 2006;295(16):1901-1906.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Leslie W. Miller
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1656-1657.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Daniel B. Sims, Yoshifumi Naka, and Ulrich P. Jorde
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1657.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes of Medicare Beneficiaries With Ventricular Assist Devices
Mark S. Slaughter
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1657-1658.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.