 |
 |

Rapid Response Team Implementation and Hospital Mortality Rates
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their cohort study, Dr Chan and colleagues1 showed that rapid response team implementation did not improve mortality at their institution. It is reasonable to expect that the effect of implementing a rapid response team would vary among hospitals and even within different areas of the same hospital, depending on staff resources and experience levels. It would therefore be useful to know additional characteristics of their hospital.
Additionally, the purpose of a rapid response team is to reduce preventable mortality, which may not translate into a statistically significant reduction in overall mortality. Previous studies suggest that patients in approximately 66% of codes show significant vital sign abnormalities (which are the usual triggers for rapid response team activation) in the hours prior to a code.2 It would be interesting to see data on the number of patients who met rapid response team activation criteria before and after implementation . . . [Full Text of this Article]
John H. Sherner, MD
john.sherner@amedd.army.mil Walter Reed Army Medical Center Washington, DC
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Hospital-wide Code Rates and Mortality Before and After Implementation of a Rapid Response Team
Paul S. Chan, Adnan Khalid, Lance S. Longmore, Robert A. Berg, Mikhail Kosiborod, and John A. Spertus
JAMA. 2008;300(21):2506-2513.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Rapid Response Team Implementation and Hospital Mortality Rates
Stuart F. Reynolds, Rinaldo Bellomo, and Ken Hillman
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1659.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Rapid Response Team Implementation and Hospital Mortality Rates—Reply
Paul S. Chan and John A. Spertus
JAMA. 2009;301(16):1660.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|