You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 2, January 14, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving the Quality of Health Care

Who Is Responsible for What?

J. Frank Wharam, MB, BCh, BAO, MPH; Daniel Sulmasy, OFM, MD, PhD

JAMA. 2009;301(2):215-217.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Suboptimal health care quality is an urgent national concern.1 Recently, policy makers have sought to improve quality by providing bonus dollars to physicians whose patients achieve certain health goals.2 The privatized US health care system has engendered decentralized quality improvement approaches3 and an unintended consequence has been ambiguity regarding who is responsible for quality and the scope of stakeholders' obligations. For example, some pay-for-performance arrangements effectively pay physicians less if their patients with diabetes miss appointments and fail to take prescribed medications.4-5 Pay-for-performance also does not typically assess diagnostic skills or clinician empathy,3 traits that patients value highly.6 These measurement flaws have frustrated physicians5, 7 and a backlash could derail potentially valuable improvement efforts.

In this Commentary, the stakeholders responsible for improving health care quality are identified and their shared and unique obligations are outlined. The resulting framework may . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Quality Health Care: What Is It and Who Is Responsible?

Quality Health Care for Individual Patients

Quality Health Care for Populations

Pay for Performance as a Quality Improvement Approach

Quality Improvement in General

Author Affiliations: Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Wharam); and St Vincent's Hospital, Manhattan and New York Medical College, New York (Dr Sulmasy).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Resource Use, Patient Education, and Improving the Quality of Health Care
Steve G. Hubbard
JAMA. 2009;301(19):1990.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Resource Use, Patient Education, and Improving the Quality of Health Care—Reply
J. Frank Wharam and Daniel Sulmasy
JAMA. 2009;301(19):1990.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Resource Use, Patient Education, and Improving the Quality of Health Care
Hubbard
JAMA 2009;301:1990-1990.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.