You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 21, June 3, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Pediatrics
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Obesity
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Nutritively Sweetened Beverages and Obesity—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: Drs Ebbeling and Ludwig clarify the nature of the attention and contact provided to participants in the NSB reduction group but not provided to their study's control participants.1 However, while they maintain this was an unlikely confounder, earlier findings documenting beneficial effects of mail and telephone contacts on weight control2 challenge this assertion. Only good experimental design holding therapeutic contact constant across experimental groups can resolve this issue.

We accept the statement by Ebbeling and Ludwig that their subgroup analysis in children with higher baseline BMI was preplanned. However, we remain concerned about other aspects of the study design, including that BMI status was not described as an eligibility criterion, power calculations did not take this into consideration, and the high-BMI cutoff used in the preplanned analysis differed from that used in the stratified randomization, contrary to standard procedure.3 It is surprising that, given this subgroup finding in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

David B. Allison, PhD
dallison@uab.edu
Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Nutrition Research Center
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Richard D. Mattes, PhD
Department of Foods and Nutrition
Purdue University
West Lafayette, Indiana



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Nutritively Sweetened Beverage Consumption and Obesity: The Need for Solid Evidence on a Fluid Issue
David B. Allison and Richard D. Mattes
JAMA. 2009;301(3):318-320.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Nutritively Sweetened Beverages and Obesity
Cara B. Ebbeling and David S. Ludwig
JAMA. 2009;301(21):2209-2210.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Nutritively Sweetened Beverages and Obesity
Vasanti S. Malik, Walter C. Willett, and Frank B. Hu
JAMA. 2009;301(21):2210.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.