You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 22, June 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Capitol Health Call
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •War
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Walter Reed Care Still Lags

Mike Mitka

JAMA. 2009;301(22):2318.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The Army has taken several steps to improve its outpatient case management of service members wounded in action, but more can be done, concluded the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in a report released April 20.

The report (http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09357.pdf) noted that after a 2007 series of articles in the Washington Post disclosed problems at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, DC, the Army established Warrior Transition Units for service members requiring complex outpatient case management. The units operate at 33 military installations in the United States as well as 3 locations in Germany. Each service member requiring care through these units is assigned to a team comprising a primary care manager, a nurse case manager who coordinates and monitors the care, and a squad leader who ensures the patient attends medical and administrative appointments.


Figure 90004FA
Walter Reed Army Medical Center still has not revised its staffing levels . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.