You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 22, June 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Radiation Therapy
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Diagnosis
 •Angiology
 •Computed Tomography
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radiation Doses Associated With Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: We agree with Dr Price that reliable information on radiation dose estimates in routine clinical practice is not readily available. The reasons for this include evolving dosimetry concepts and understanding of radiation biology and rapid turnover in medical imaging technologies. A recent catalog of effective dose estimates in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine1 acknowledges these methodological difficulties yet provides a useful overview. However, it is perhaps more important for individual clinicians to learn the concept of performing the right imaging test for the right patient than to know the dose estimates for the latest generation of imaging equipment and protocols. This concept entails judicious consideration of the potential risks and benefits of performing a radiological diagnostic examination in each patient's individual situation rather than reflexively ordering tests to address remote diagnostic possibilities or even medicolegal concerns. A recent report from the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements2 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Jörg Hausleiter, MD
hausleiter@dhm.mhn.de
Deutsches Herzzentrum München
Klinik an der Technischen Universität München
Munich, Germany

Thomas C. Gerber, MD
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases
Mayo Clinic
Jacksonville, Florida

Stephan Achenbach, MD
Medizinische Klinik 2
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, Germany



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Radiation Doses Associated With Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography
Joseph M. Price
JAMA. 2009;301(22):2324.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiation Doses Associated With Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography
Iyad N. Daher
JAMA. 2009;301(22):2324.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Radiation Doses Associated With Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography
Razvan C. Opreanu and John P. Kepros
JAMA. 2009;301(22):2324-2325.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.