You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 22, June 10, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Book and Media Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Otolaryngology/ Head & Neck Surgery
 •Pediatric Otolaryngology
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?


Pediatric Airway: Cry, Stridor, and Cough

By Jenö Hirschberg, Tamás Szende, Peter J. Koltai, and András Illényi
318 pp (with CD), $155
San Diego, CA, Plural Publishing Inc, 2009
ISBN-13: 978-1-5975-6086-3

JAMA. 2009;301(22):2392.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

This detailed book edited by Hirschberg, Szende, Koltai, and Illényi presents the results of 45 years of work in the subjective and objective analysis of the pathologic respiratory sounds made by 370 infants and young children. The children were referred to 3 hospitals in Budapest for evaluation of pathologic sound phenomena of respiratory origin. All sounds were preverbal, nonspeech sounds. The case selections were based on the authors' examination of nearly 3000 infants with pathologic sound phenomena. There is no discussion, however, as to how and why the case children were selected for acoustic analysis from this group of 3000 individuals; likewise, there is no discussion if they were selected because they were deemed representative of their condition or whether there was a more random reason for selection, thereby reducing a potential selection bias. The authors have taken care to include a control group of 50 healthy infants but do . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Adam Frosh, MB, BCh, FRCS(Edin), FRCS(ORL-HNS), Reviewer
Lister Hospital
Coreys Mill Lane, United Kingdom
a.frosh@btinternet.com



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.