You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 23, June 17, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Health Policy
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Science of Health Care Reform

Robert H. Brook, MD, ScD

JAMA. 2009;301(23):2486-2487.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Another health policy window has opened; through it will stream proposals to reform the US health care system. President Obama has demanded that reform proposals improve both coverage and quality of care and make health care more affordable for all Americans. Extending coverage without worrying about costs would be relatively easy. Improving quality of care without worrying about costs might also be achievable. But extending coverage and improving quality while also making coverage more affordable will be difficult.

The first step in pursuing the President's goals is to review what science has revealed about the system. Two studies could provide the context for health care reform. The first, the RAND Health Insurance Experiment (HIE),1 was conducted more than 3 decades ago and would cost about 1 billion dollars to replicate today. The second, actually a combination of studies conducted mainly in the United States, is . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: RAND Health, Santa Monica, California.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Does Comparative Effectiveness Have a Comparative Edge?
G. Caleb Alexander and Randall S. Stafford
JAMA. 2009;301(23):2488-2490.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Mental Health Theme Issue: Call for Papers
Glass
JAMA 2009;302:439-440.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.