This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related letters  • Related article  • Similar articles in JAMA  Topic Collections  • Medical Practice  • Medical Practice, Other  • Oncology  • Colon Cancer  • Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care  • Treatment Adherence  • Radiologic Imaging  • Surgery  • Surgical Interventions  • Colorectal Surgery  • Diagnosis  • Screening  • Computed Tomography  • Drug Therapy  • Adherence  • Gastroenterology  • Gastrointestinal Diseases  • Alert me on articles by topic  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Trading Accuracy for Access and Compliance

Emily Finlayson, MD, MS

JAMA. 2009;301(23):2498-2499.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

With nearly 150 000 cases detected annually, colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States.¹ Over the past 2 decades, however, the annual death rate from colorectal cancer has been declining. This improvement has partially been attributed to an increase in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance nationally. Removal of polyps that have the potential for future malignant transformation and the detection of colorectal cancer at an earlier, more curable stage have contributed to the reduction of colorectal cancer deaths.² While colonoscopy remains the gold standard for detection of colorectal pathology, alternative modalities used for screening, including flexible sigmoidoscopy, double-contrast barium enema, and computed tomographic (CT) colonography, are acceptable choices for average-risk patients.³

For individuals at increased risk for the development of colorectal cancer—those with a family history of colorectal cancer in a first-degree relative or personal history of advanced adenomas—colonoscopy . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliation: Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTERS

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Claude Matuchansky
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1527.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Paul Pisarik
JAMA. 2009;302(14):1527-1528.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Colonography for the Detection of Advanced Neoplasia in Individuals at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer
Daniele Regge, Cristiana Laudi, Giovanni Galatola, Patrizia Della Monica, Luigina Bonelli, Giuseppe Angelelli, Roberto Asnaghi, Brunella Barbaro, Carlo Bartolozzi, Didier Bielen, Luca Boni, Claudia Borghi, Paolo Bruzzi, Maria Carla Cassinis, Massimo Galia, Teresa Maria Gallo, Andrea Grasso, Cesare Hassan, Andrea Laghi, Maria Cristina Martina, Emanuele Neri, Carlo Senore, Giovanni Simonetti, Silvia Venturini, and Giovanni Gandini
JAMA. 2009;301(23):2453-2461.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Matuchansky
JAMA 2009;302:1527-1527.
FULL TEXT  

Computed Tomographic Colonography for Detecting Advanced Neoplasia
Pisarik
JAMA 2009;302:1527-1528.
FULL TEXT  

CT Colonography for Colorectal Cancer Screening
JWatch Gastroenterology 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT