You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 4, January 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System, Other
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Renal Diseases
 •Renal Diseases, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Angiology
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride in Preventing Contrast Medium–Induced Nephropathy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Brar and colleagues1 studied the use of sodium bicarbonate to prevent CIN. If effective, sodium bicarbonate would be a readily available, inexpensive, and safe means to prevent a common iatrogenic cause of renal damage. In interpreting this study, several aspects of the design introduced differences between the intervention and control groups beyond the type of fluid administered.

By choosing to mix sodium bicarbonate into a dextrose solution (instead of into sterile water), the researchers created a hyperosmolar fluid. The dextrose and bicarbonate solution given to the intervention group had 478 mOsm/L while the normal saline given to the control group had a physiologic osmolarity of 310 mOsm/L. The hyperosmolar nature of the fluid given to the bicarbonate group could have potentially obscured any benefit of bicarbonate on glomerular flow rate.2

Additionally, the sodium concentrations of the fluid administered to the 2 groups were different: 130 mEq . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Bradley D. Shy, MD
bradley.shy@nyumc.org
Department of Emergency Medicine

Amit Gupta, MD; Robert S. Hoffman, MD
New York City Poison Control Center
New York University School of Medicine
New York, New York



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride for the Prevention of Contrast Medium–Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Trial
Somjot S. Brar, Albert Yuh-Jer Shen, Michael B. Jorgensen, Adam Kotlewski, Vicken J. Aharonian, Natasha Desai, Michael Ree, Ahmed Ijaz Shah, and Raoul J. Burchette
JAMA. 2008;300(9):1038-1046.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride in Preventing Contrast Medium–Induced Nephropathy
William Burgess, Gregory J. Merten, and Robert A. Rittase
JAMA. 2009;301(4):377.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride in Preventing Contrast Medium–Induced Nephropathy
Mehmet Kanbay, Benan Kasapoglu, and Ali Akcay
JAMA. 2009;301(4):378.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride in Preventing Contrast Medium–Induced Nephropathy
Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera, José M. Vázquez-Rodríguez, and Jesús Peteiro
JAMA. 2009;301(4):378-379.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride in Preventing Contrast Medium–Induced Nephropathy—Reply
Somjot S. Brar, Albert Yuh-Jer Shen, and Michael B. Jorgensen
JAMA. 2009;301(4):379-380.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.