You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 5, February 4, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Neurology
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Adult Critical Care
 •Psychiatry
 •Delirium
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Drug Therapy
 •Drug Therapy, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A New Era for Sedation in ICU Patients

Hannah Wunsch, MD, MSc; John P. Kress, MD

JAMA. 2009;301(5):542-544. Published online February 2, 2009 (doi:10.1001/jama.2009.24).

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Critically ill patients frequently require invasive monitoring and other support that can lead to anxiety, agitation, and pain.1 Use of sedation is essential for the comfort and safety of these patients. Options for sedation in the intensive care unit (ICU) are limited, with benzodiazepines and propofol the most common choices.2-3 In the past, these agents were generally used to keep patients motionless and to reduce memory of their experience in the ICU. However, recognition that heavy sedation may increase mortality and morbidity has led to a new model in which the emphasis is on maximizing the comfort of these patients while they remain interactive, oriented, and able to follow instructions.4 This new model relies on strategies such as daily interruptions of sedation,5 use of scores such as the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale to maintain target sedation level,6 and minimizing the use of paralytic . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University, New York, New York (Dr Wunsch); Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois (Dr Kress).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Dexmedetomidine vs Midazolam for Sedation of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Trial
Richard R. Riker, Yahya Shehabi, Paula M. Bokesch, Daniel Ceraso, Wayne Wisemandle, Firas Koura, Patrick Whitten, Benjamin D. Margolis, Daniel W. Byrne, E. Wesley Ely, Marcelo G. Rocha, and for the SEDCOM (Safety and Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine Compared With Midazolam) Study Group
JAMA. 2009;301(5):489-499.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Comparing Dexmedetomidine With Midazolam for Sedation of Patients in the ICU
Rady et al.
JAMA 2009;301:2439-2440.
FULL TEXT  

A New Approach to Sedation in the ICU
JWatch General 2009;2009:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.