 |
 |

Internet-Based Education for Health Professionals
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: The meta-analysis of Internet-based learning in the health professions by Dr Cook and colleagues1 puts to rest 2 very important issues that have plagued research in medical education for decades. First, the authors addressed whether an innovative educational method works (ie, is it efficacious?). In the study by Cook et al, this innovation is the Internet and their meta-analysis came up with the best answer possible given the methodological limitations in the primary studies. As the authors rightly identified, the main question educators want answered is not "Does it work?" but "When does it work?"2-3 The research agenda needs to move on and medical education researchers and journal editors need to adapt to this change.
Second, the authors have shown that researchers in medical education are in desperate need of a different method of synthesizing the research evidence in medical education. Educational interventions (of whatever type) are . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Geoff Wong, MD(Res), MRCGP
g.wong@pcps.ucl.ac.uk Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health University College London Medical School London, United Kingdom
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Internet-Based Learning in the Health Professions: A Meta-analysis
David A. Cook, Anthony J. Levinson, Sarah Garside, Denise M. Dupras, Patricia J. Erwin, and Victor M. Montori
JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181-1196.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Internet-Based Education for Health Professionals
Rita Banzi, Ivan Moschetti, and Lorenzo Moja
JAMA. 2009;301(6):599.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Internet-Based Education for Health Professionals—Reply
David A. Cook, Victor M. Montori, and Anthony J. Levinson
JAMA. 2009;301(6):599-600.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|