You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 6, February 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Informatics/ Internet in Medicine
 •Internet
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Education
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Internet-Based Education for Health Professionals

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The meta-analysis by Dr Cook and colleagues1 deals with the very current topic of Internet-based education for health professionals. The authors conducted a comprehensive and rigorous approach: multiple dimensions (satisfaction, knowledge, and behaviors) were considered both for experimental and quasi-experimental studies. Unfortunately, neither methodological accuracy nor the broad inclusion criteria can overcome the weakness of the primary research included in the analysis. The consistency of the results demonstrated by the sensitivity analysis may be reassuring regarding the inclusion of many uncontrolled before-and-after designs (more than half in the Internet-based learning vs no intervention comparison), but more concerns arise from the novelty effect sometimes referred to as the Hawthorne effect.2

Because double-blinding is usually impracticable in human behavior research, the review process of interventions designed to improve professional practice, including educational systems, presents additional pitfalls in how best to interpret trial results.3 Positive excitement and attention effects caused . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Rita Banzi, PhD
banzi@marionegri.it

Ivan Moschetti, MD; Lorenzo Moja, MD, MSc, DrPH
Italian Cochrane Centre
Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
Milan, Italy



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Internet-Based Learning in the Health Professions: A Meta-analysis
David A. Cook, Anthony J. Levinson, Sarah Garside, Denise M. Dupras, Patricia J. Erwin, and Victor M. Montori
JAMA. 2008;300(10):1181-1196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Internet-Based Education for Health Professionals
Geoff Wong
JAMA. 2009;301(6):598-599.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Internet-Based Education for Health Professionals—Reply
David A. Cook, Victor M. Montori, and Anthony J. Levinson
JAMA. 2009;301(6):599-600.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.