 |
 |

Measuring Professionalism in Resident Physicians
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: In their study of behaviors of highly professional resident physicians, Dr Reed and colleagues1 attempted to measure professionalism using instrument items they describe as reflecting the best practices in professionalism measurement. However, we believe that a consideration of measurement requirements and useful measure construction is warranted.
Measures are useful when they are unidimensional and linear and use a standard unit of measurement repeated throughout the measurement continuum.2 A tape measure is an example of such measures; length or width is measured separately on a linear equal-interval scale using a standard unit (inches or centimeters). These measurement requirements, which are needed in both physical and social sciences, appear violated in the professionalism measurement developed in the study by Reed et al.
Unidimensional measures capture one dimension at a time. Unidimensionality reflects an instrument's intent for use with a single construct. Measuring one dimension at a time allows for . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Michael J. Peeters, PharmD
michael.peeters@utoledo.edu College of Pharmacy
Svetlana Beltyukova, PhD
College of Education University of Toledo Toledo, Ohio
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Behaviors of Highly Professional Resident Physicians
Darcy A. Reed, Colin P. West, Paul S. Mueller, Robert D. Ficalora, Gregory J. Engstler, and Thomas J. Beckman
JAMA. 2008;300(11):1326-1333.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTER
Measuring Professionalism in Resident Physicians—Reply
Darcy A. Reed, Colin P. West, and Thomas J. Beckman
JAMA. 2009;301(7):723-724.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|