You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 7, February 18, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Academic Medical Centers
 •Medical Education
 •Quality of Care
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinicians in Quality Improvement

A New Career Pathway in Academic Medicine

Kaveh G. Shojania, MD; Wendy Levinson, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2009;301(7):766-768.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Academic medical centers (AMCs) strive for excellence in patient care, education, and research. Until relatively recently, academic physicians were expected to excel in all 3 areas, even though criteria for promotion typically emphasized accomplishments in research, paying little attention to faculty members' educational contributions. Tracks for clinician educators have done much to rectify this situation,1-2 with explicit guidelines for promotion on the basis of educational scholarship.3

With widespread interest in quality improvement (QI) and patient safety, a new challenge exists in academic medicine, namely acknowledging the contributions of faculty members who excel in these areas. These faculty members range from clinician scientists with full-time research programs focused on health care quality to more operationally oriented faculty who lead local QI projects. However, most faculties of medicine do not have mechanisms to encourage the development of faculty engaged in QI activities. In this . . . [Full Text of this Article]

The Need for Faculty Engaged in QI

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Improving Access to Specialty Care for Chronic Cough
Lim
Chest 2009;136:959-961.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.