 |
 |

Reassessment of Clinical Practice GuidelinesGo Gently Into That Good Night
Terrence M. Shaneyfelt, MD, MPH;
Robert M. Centor, MD
JAMA. 2009;301(8):868-869.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In 1990, the Institute of Medicine proposed guideline development to reduce inappropriate health care variation by assisting patient and practitioner decisions.1 Unfortunately, too many current guidelines have become marketing and opinion-based pieces, delivering directive rather than assistive statements.
Current use of the term guideline has strayed far from the original intent of the Institute of Medicine. Most current articles called "guidelines" are actually expert consensus reports. It is not surprising, then, that the article by Tricoci et al2 in this issue of JAMA demonstrates that revisions of the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines have shifted to more class II recommendations (conflicting evidence and/or divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment) and that 48% of the time, these recommendations are based on the lowest level of evidence (level C: expert opinion, case studies, or . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Dr Shaneyfelt) and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine (Drs Shaneyfelt and Centor), Birmingham; Huntsville Regional Medical Campus, Huntsville, Alabama (Dr Centor).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTERS
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Christian M. Pettker and Edmund F. Funai
JAMA. 2009;302(2):143.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Elliott M. Antman and Raymond J. Gibbons
JAMA. 2009;302(2):143-144.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Mark D. Huffman and Robert O. Bonow
JAMA. 2009;302(2):144-145.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
John Concato and Ralph I. Horwitz
JAMA. 2009;302(2):145.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Robert S. Bobrow
JAMA. 2009;302(2):145.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Shyam S. Kothari
JAMA. 2009;302(2):145.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Scientific Evidence Underlying the ACC/AHA Clinical Practice Guidelines
Pierluigi Tricoci, Joseph M. Allen, Judith M. Kramer, Robert M. Califf, and Sidney C. Smith, Jr
JAMA. 2009;301(8):831-841.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Measuring Outcomes in Nasal Surgery: Realities and Possibilities
Rhee
Arch Facial Plast Surg 2009;11:416-419.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Huffman and Bonow
JAMA 2009;302:144-145.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Concato and Horwitz
JAMA 2009;302:145-145.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Pettker and Funai
JAMA 2009;302:143-143.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Antman and Gibbons
JAMA 2009;302:143-144.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Bobrow
JAMA 2009;302:145-145.
FULL TEXT
Clinical Practice Guidelines and Scientific Evidence
Kothari
JAMA 2009;302:145-145.
FULL TEXT
Intravenous fluids in adults undergoing surgery
Liu and Finfer
BMJ 2009;338:b2418-b2418.
FULL TEXT
Improving the Primary Care-Specialty Care Interface: Getting From Here to There
Chen and Yee
Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1024-1026.
FULL TEXT
Toward international primary care reform
Starfield
CMAJ 2009;180:1091-1092.
FULL TEXT
Not Enough Evidence for Evidence-Based Guidelines?
Journal Watch Cardiology 2009;2009:3-3.
FULL TEXT
Critique of Clinical Practice Guidelines
JWatch General 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT
|