You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 9, March 4, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Patient-Physician Relationship/ Care
 •Psychosocial Issues
 •Psychiatry
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Analyzing Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their meta-analysis on the effectiveness of LTPP, Drs Leichsenring and Rabung1 reported evidence that LTPP is an effective treatment for complex mental disorders. Although the article addressed several limitations of the findings, other limitations should be considered as well.

First, Leichsenring and Rabung formulated an unconventionally broad research question. Systematic review objectives typically define the patient population, intervention, control treatment, outcomes, and study designs of interest.2 These authors defined the patient population broadly as a group of adults with mental disorders. The sole criterion that outcomes should have fulfilled is that they were reliable. Control treatments were not defined at all. Thus, analyzed diagnoses, outcomes, and control groups showed a very large clinical heterogeneity. Although the reviewers tried to account for this through subgroup analyses, their method of building clusters of heterogeneous disorders and outcomes still allowed for considerable variation. Thus, it is unclear for what . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Levente Kriston, PhD
l.kriston@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Department of Medical Psychology
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, Germany

Lars Hölzel, MA
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy
University Medical Center Freiburg
Freiburg, Germany

Martin Härter, MD, PhD
Department of Medical Psychology
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A Meta-analysis
Falk Leichsenring and Sven Rabung
JAMA. 2008;300(13):1551-1565.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Analyzing Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
Brett D. Thombs, Marielle Bassel, and Lisa R. Jewett
JAMA. 2009;301(9):930.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analyzing Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
Aaron T. Beck and Sunil S. Bhar
JAMA. 2009;301(9):931.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analyzing Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
Stefan Roepke and Babette Renneberg
JAMA. 2009;301(9):931-932.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Analyzing Effectiveness of Long-term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy—Reply
Falk Leichsenring and Sven Rabung
JAMA. 2009;301(9):932-933.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.