You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 301 No. 9, March 4, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Venous Thromboembolism
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Diagnosis
 •Ultrasonography
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ultrasound-Based Diagnostic Strategies for Deep Vein Thrombosis

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: In their randomized controlled trial, Dr Bernardi and colleagues1 found equivalent safety for 2 ultrasound-based diagnostic strategies for managing outpatients with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The results of the study deserve some comments.

First, for the 2-point strategy the prevalence of proximal DVT detection on the second ultrasound test was 5.5% (14/256). This is much higher than has been previously reported. For example, in the study by Cogo et al,2 which included more than 1700 patients with suspected DVT, this rate was less than 1%.2 It has been suggested that the second ultrasound test is of limited added value, and strategies have been proposed using a single proximal venous examination, which proved to have an acceptable 3-month thromboembolic rate.3 However, the use of a single proximal vein ultrasonography might be criticized if the prevalence of proximal DVT detected at the second ultrasound test is as high . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Isabelle Quere, MD
isabelle.queree@wanadoo.fr
Montpellier University Hospital
Montpellier, France

Marc Righini, MD
Geneva University Hospital
Geneva, Switzerland



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Serial 2-Point Ultrasonography Plus D-Dimer vs Whole-Leg Color-Coded Doppler Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Suspected Symptomatic Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Enrico Bernardi, Giuseppe Camporese, Harry R. Büller, Sergio Siragusa, Davide Imberti, Arrigo Berchio, Angelo Ghirarduzzi, Fabio Verlato, Raffaela Anastasio, Carolina Prati, Andrea Piccioli, Raffaele Pesavento, Carlo Bova, Patrizia Maltempi, Nello Zanatta, Alberto Cogo, Roberto Cappelli, Eugenio Bucherini, Stefano Cuppini, Franco Noventa, Paolo Prandoni, and for the Erasmus Study Group
JAMA. 2008;300(14):1653-1659.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Ultrasound-Based Diagnostic Strategies for Deep Vein Thrombosis
Frederikus A. Klok, Melanie Tan, and Menno V. Huisman
JAMA. 2009;301(9):933-934.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Ultrasound-Based Diagnostic Strategies for Deep Vein Thrombosis—Reply
Enrico Bernardi, Giuseppe Camporese, and Franco Noventa
JAMA. 2009;301(9):934-935.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.