You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 10, September 9, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmology
 •Ophthalmological Disorders
 •Cataracts/ Lens
 •Ophthalmological Procedures
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Drug Therapy
 •Adverse Effects
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tamsulosin and Ophthalmic Adverse Events After Cataract Surgery—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In Reply: While we understand that there may be some ambiguity in the isolated sentence quoted by Dr Ponce-de-Leon, we do not believe that the context of the full abstract results section suggests a direct comparison between exposed and unexposed cohort members. The second sentence states, "Two hundred eighty-four patients (0.3%) had an adverse event," noting the overall adverse event rate in the entire cohort of men undergoing cataract surgery. The sentence describing the 7.5% and 2.7% adverse event rates was intended to refer to the proportions in the 280 cases and 1102 randomly matched controls. Moreover, the findings were reinforced by the final sentence that noted an estimated number needed to harm of 255, a statistic that incorporates absolute risk.1

We agree with Dr Gaynes that identifying a theoretical cause and biological plausibility for our findings can be difficult. A disconnection between what would be expected from pharmacologic experiments . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Chaim Bell, MD, PhD
bellc@smh.toronto.on.ca
Department of Medicine
St Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Andrea Gruneir, PhD; Paula Rochon, MD, MPH
Women's College Research Institute
Toronto



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: XX. Integrating Research Evidence With the Care of the Individual Patient
Finlay A. McAlister, Sharon E. Straus, Gordon H. Guyatt, R. Brian Haynes, and for the Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
JAMA. 2000;283(21):2829-2836.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Tamsulosin and Ophthalmic Adverse Events After Cataract Surgery
Sergio Ponce-de-Leon
JAMA. 2009;302(10):1054.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tamsulosin and Ophthalmic Adverse Events After Cataract Surgery
Bruce I. Gaynes
JAMA. 2009;302(10):1055.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.