You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 13, October 7, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Medical Practice, Other
 •Psychiatry
 •Substance Abuse/ Alcoholism
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Applying Health Care Reform Principles to Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

Kavita Patel, MD, MSHS; Kenneth Wells, MD, MPH

JAMA. 2009;302(13):1463-1464.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The US political system is debating the desirability and feasibility of health care reform. Discussions focus on expanding coverage while reforming delivery to contain costs and ensure quality,1 but there has been little discussion about how to apply reform principles to mental health and substance abuse (MHSA) conditions and services. The passage of federal parity bills for private plans and outpatient Medicare services2 underscores the policy interest in ensuring financial access and the timeliness of considering application of reform principles to these services. This Commentary highlights features of MHSA conditions and services that affect consideration of reform principles.

Access to Health Care for All Americans

There are differences in MHSA services availability and financing between private and public sectors.3 Not all private plans cover all MSHA conditions and services, and MHSA coverage is often less generous than for medical conditions, although such coverage has improved over time.3-4 Federal parity . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs, the White House, Washington, DC (Dr Patel); and Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, the Departments of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine and UCLA School of Public Health, and the RAND Health Program, Los Angeles, California (Dr Wells).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.