 |
 |

Corticosteroid Therapy for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor: Dr Annane and colleagues1 conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock. In thinking about future research, we would like to raise a question about the statistical methods that have been used to evaluate shock reversal after steroid use. This is a situation of competing risks because another end point (death) may occur before shock reversal.
The trials that studied shock reversal (Figure 5 in the study by Annane et al) used the Kaplan-Meier method to identify time to shock reversal. As a tool of time-to-event analysis, this method is ideal for working with time to a single type of event. Kaplan-Meier analysis assumes independence between event and censoring, an assumption not met when analyzing shock reversal and death.2-3 When there are competing events, such as death and shock reversal, Kaplan-Meier analysis gives a false picture . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Rafael Barberena Moraes, MD
tchemoraes@hotmail.com
Mauro Antonio Czepielewski, MD, PhD
Division of Endocrinology Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul School of Medicine Porto Alegre, Brazil
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Corticosteroids in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in Adults: A Systematic Review
Djillali Annane, Eric Bellissant, Pierre-Edouard Bollaert, Josef Briegel, Marco Confalonieri, Raffaele De Gaudio, Didier Keh, Yizhak Kupfer, Michael Oppert, and G. Umberto Meduri
JAMA. 2009;301(22):2362-2375.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED LETTERS
Corticosteroid Therapy for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock
Peter C. Minneci, Katherine J. Deans, and Charles Natanson
JAMA. 2009;302(15):1643.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Corticosteroid Therapy for Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock—Reply
Djillali Annane
JAMA. 2009;302(15):1644-1645.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|