You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 16, October 28, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letter
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Quality of Care
 •Patient Safety/ Medical Error
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Angiology
 •Computed Tomography
 •Cardiovascular Disease/ Myocardial Infarction
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Radiation Dose-Reduction Program for Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: The study by Dr Raff and colleagues1 demonstrated that the implementation of a radiation dose-reduction program for cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) may be effective. In addition, the authors noted that there was no significant change in the median image quality assessment in the control compared with the follow-up period. However, Table 2 indicates an increase in the proportion of studies with poor or nondiagnostic scores from the control period to the follow-up period (4.2% vs 7.7%, respectively). Although the median score of image quality remained unchanged, the observation that approximately 1 in every 13 studies were nondiagnostic in the follow-up period is of concern.

Several potential causes (other than chance) may explain this relatively high number of nondiagnostic scans. First, modification of scan parameters such as tube voltage and tube current modulation with implementation of the dose-reduction protocol could have affected the perception of physicians who . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Felipe S. Torres, MD
felipe.torres@uhn.on.ca

Andrew M. Crean, MD; Narinder Paul, MD
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, Canada



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Radiation Dose From Cardiac Computed Tomography Before and After Implementation of Radiation Dose–Reduction Techniques
Gilbert L. Raff, Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan, David A. Share, Tauqir Y. Goraya, Ella A. Kazerooni, Mauro Moscucci, Ralph E. Gentry, Aiden Abidov, and for the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium Co-Investigators
JAMA. 2009;301(22):2340-2348.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTER

Radiation Dose-Reduction Program for Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography—Reply
Gilbert L. Raff, Kavitha M. Chinnaiyan, and Aiden Abidov
JAMA. 2009;302(16):1753.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.