You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 18, November 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Pacemakers/ Defibrillators
 •Cardiovascular System
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Arrhythmias
 •Cardiac Diagnostic Tests
 •Cardiovascular Intervention
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Outcomes in Patients With Prolonged PR Interval or First-Degree Atrioventricular Block

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To the Editor: Dr Cheng and colleagues1 demonstrated that PR interval prolongation is associated with an increased risk of future AF, need for pacemaker implantation, and all-cause mortality. To help validate this study and determine whether its findings can be incorporated into clinical practice, it would be helpful to have a number of pieces of information about associated conditions that could have contributed to PR prolongation and its outcomes.

The authors included pacemaker implantation as one of the variables because it might act as a surrogate for advanced conduction system disease. However, the requirements for pacemaker in these patients were not clearly described. The only predisposing conditions noted were high-grade AV nodal block (present in 36% of the participants) and sinus node dysfunction (present in 53%). Other conduction abnormalities in association with PR prolongation, which by themselves could lead to pacemaker placement and to all-cause mortality,2 were not addressed.

Although . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Vijay Arun Doraiswamy, MD
temple007@gmail.com
Department of Internal Medicine
University of Arizona College of Medicine
Tucson



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Long-term Outcomes in Individuals With Prolonged PR Interval or First-Degree Atrioventricular Block
Susan Cheng, Michelle J. Keyes, Martin G. Larson, Elizabeth L. McCabe, Christopher Newton-Cheh, Daniel Levy, Emelia J. Benjamin, Ramachandran S. Vasan, and Thomas J. Wang
JAMA. 2009;301(24):2571-2577.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Outcomes in Patients With Prolonged PR Interval or First-Degree Atrioventricular Block
Jaewon Oh, Ho Youn Won, and Seok-Min Kang
JAMA. 2009;302(18):1967.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Outcomes in Patients With Prolonged PR Interval or First-Degree Atrioventricular Block—Reply
Susan Cheng and Thomas J. Wang
JAMA. 2009;302(18):1967-1968.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.