You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 18, November 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care
 •Evidence-Based Medicine
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Research Sites—The Underappreciated Component of the Clinical Research System

Robert M. Califf, MD

JAMA. 2009;302(18):2025-2027.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

As the culture of medicine moves toward an evidence-based learning health system, high-quality research is needed to guide choices made by patients, physicians, administrators, and policy makers. However, the system responsible for generating that evidence in the United States is in crisis, as demonstrated by erosions of system efficiency,1 waning interest in clinical research among practitioners, and financial insolvency among participants in the clinical research enterprise.

Recent efforts have aimed at improving research coordination and data analysis through centralized organization and application of technology, while leveraging databases and registries has achieved an exalted status in comparative effectiveness research. Less attention, however, has been paid to issues surrounding prospective research in the patient care setting, and the fundamental unit of clinical research—the clinical research site (CRS)—has been particularly neglected. Despite their vital contributions, CRSs are largely underappreciated in the clinical research enterprise, toiling in obscurity while others . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Key Issues Facing CRSs

Conflict of Commitment

Financial Pressures

Regulatory Burdens, Risk Aversion, and Research Priorities

Author Affiliations: Duke Translational Medicine Institute and the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.