You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 302 No. 18, November 11, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Topic Collections
 •Critical Care/ Intensive Care Medicine
 •Pulmonary Diseases
 •Pulmonary Diseases, Other
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Improving Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients

The Seduction of Physiology

Arthur S. Slutsky, MD

JAMA. 2009;302(18):2030-2032.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), the most severe form of acute lung injury, is a deadly condition characterized by infiltrates on chest radiography and severe hypoxemia not secondary to left heart failure. The syndrome affects approximately 200 000 adults in the United States annually and has a mortality of 35% to 45%.1 Ironically, mechanical ventilation—a therapy that is initially lifesaving—has contributed to the subsequent high mortality. In clinicians' previous zeal to maintain relatively normal blood gas values, they ventilated patients using relatively large tidal volumes. This approach changed with greater insight into the pathophysiology of ARDS, better understanding of the importance of ventilator-induced lung injury,2 and a large-scale clinical trial demonstrating that a ventilatory strategy using smaller tidal volumes decreased mortality from 40% to 31%.3 However, mortality in patients with ARDS remains high, and in some patients the current lung-protective strategy is not lung-protective enough. This . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Author Affiliations: Keenan Research Center at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; and Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto. Dr Slutsky is Affiliate Scientist, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and Visiting Professor, Dipartimento di Anestesia, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista-Molinette, Università di Torino, Turin, Italy.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Prone Positioning in Patients With Moderate and Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Paolo Taccone, Antonio Pesenti, Roberto Latini, Federico Polli, Federica Vagginelli, Cristina Mietto, Luisa Caspani, Ferdinando Raimondi, Giovanni Bordone, Gaetano Iapichino, Jordi Mancebo, Claude Guérin, Louis Ayzac, Lluis Blanch, Roberto Fumagalli, Gianni Tognoni, Luciano Gattinoni, and for the Prone-Supine II Study Group
JAMA. 2009;302(18):1977-1984.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Not Prone to Benefit in ARDS: No Other Way to Spin It
Journal Watch Hospital Medicine 2009;2009:1-1.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.